David Guez vs Mick Lescure Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W L L L L L W W L
Form
W L W L L L W W L LHead To Head: Guez 1 - 0 Lescure
They have played 2 sets in total, with Guez winning 2 and Lescure winning 0. The last match between Guez and Lescure was at the France F18, 30-09-2013, Second, I.hard with David Guez getting the victory 7-6(4) 7-5.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| David Guez | 1 |
| Mick Lescure | 0 |
| Guez | Stats | Lescure |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| Ret. | Ranking | Ret. |
| 116 | Highest Rank | 487 |
| 42 | Age | 31 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 31 | Titles | 4 |
| 61% (641-414) | Career Total W/L | 54% (216-183) |
| $215,535 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 1 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(4) 7-5 | |||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 14 | Games Won | 11 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Return Points Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
David Guez Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats 
Zizou Bergs
Player
David Guez
67%
(
46 of
69)
1st Serve %
58%
(
52 of
90)
9
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
33 of
52)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
35%
(
24 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
41 of
90)
86
Total Points Won
73
|
6-2 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
David Guez
Player
Erik Crepaldi
59%
(
47 of
80)
1st Serve %
73%
(
63 of
86)
8
Aces
7
7
Double Faults
2
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
39 of
63)
36%
(
12 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
43%
(
34 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
37 of
86)
83
Total Points Won
83
|
2-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
David Guez
Player
Edgar Jeanmougin
57%
(
25 of
44)
1st Serve %
48%
(
20 of
42)
7
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
88%
(
22 of
25)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
25%
(
11 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
59
Total Points Won
27
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matteo Viola
Player
David Guez
61%
(
43 of
70)
1st Serve %
37%
(
28 of
75)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
20 of
47)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
43%
(
30 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
38 of
75)
78
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Antoine Escoffier
Player
David Guez
65%
(
57 of
88)
1st Serve %
61%
(
57 of
93)
6
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
65%
(
37 of
57)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
38 of
57)
71%
(
22 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
29 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
39 of
93)
98
Total Points Won
83
|
5-7 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gian Marco Moroni
Player
David Guez
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve %
59%
(
34 of
58)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
6
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
58)
65
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Egor Gerasimov
Player
David Guez
46%
(
32 of
69)
1st Serve %
47%
(
36 of
77)
7
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
6
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
41%
(
15 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
17 of
41)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
42%
(
29 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
37 of
77)
77
Total Points Won
69
|
7-6(6) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Viktor Galovic
Player
David Guez
79%
(
48 of
61)
1st Serve %
61%
(
34 of
56)
13
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
20 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
24 of
56)
65
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
David Guez
Player
Roberto Cid Subervi
53%
(
50 of
94)
1st Serve %
52%
(
51 of
99)
4
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
8
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
36 of
51)
57%
(
25 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
20 of
48)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
36%
(
34 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
43 of
99)
103
Total Points Won
90
|
4-6 7-6(6) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Laurynas Grigelis
Player
David Guez
65%
(
53 of
82)
1st Serve %
58%
(
52 of
90)
9
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
75%
(
40 of
53)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
32 of
52)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
35%
(
29 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
40 of
90)
93
Total Points Won
79
|
6-2 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Mick Lescure Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 6-6 ret. | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Tibo Colson
Player
Mick Lescure
58%
(
22 of
38)
1st Serve %
58%
(
23 of
40)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
82%
(
18 of
22)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
3 of
17)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
9 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
53
Total Points Won
25
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mick Lescure
Player
Julien De Cuyper
49%
(
18 of
37)
1st Serve %
44%
(
17 of
39)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
83%
(
15 of
18)
1st Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
10 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
53
Total Points Won
23
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mick Lescure
Player
Loann Massard
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve %
61%
(
49 of
80)
3
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
0
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
16 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
37 of
80)
76
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Julien Eon
Player
Mick Lescure
59%
(
51 of
87)
1st Serve %
58%
(
51 of
88)
9
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
5
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
32 of
51)
53%
(
19 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
15 of
37)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
43%
(
37 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
41 of
88)
91
Total Points Won
84
|
6-3 5-7 16-14 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Carlos Lopez Montagud
Player
Mick Lescure
69%
(
43 of
62)
1st Serve %
49%
(
46 of
93)
4
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
9
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
29 of
46)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
18 of
47)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
37%
(
23 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
46 of
93)
85
Total Points Won
70
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
George Loffhagen
Player
Mick Lescure
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve %
44%
(
25 of
57)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
18 of
25)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
13 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
25 of
57)
60
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mick Lescure
Player
Pierre Broquin
58%
(
21 of
36)
1st Serve %
66%
(
27 of
41)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
81%
(
17 of
21)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
8 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
52
Total Points Won
25
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Maxence Beauge
Player
Mick Lescure
56%
(
43 of
77)
1st Serve %
59%
(
48 of
82)
6
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
8
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
34 of
48)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
10 of
34)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
43%
(
33 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
38 of
82)
82
Total Points Won
77
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mick Lescure
Player
Batiste Klein
47%
(
21 of
45)
1st Serve %
43%
(
19 of
44)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
6
76%
(
16 of
21)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
12%
(
3 of
25)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
36%
(
16 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
30 of
44)
59
Total Points Won
30
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 61% (641/414) | Win/Loss | 54% (216/183) |
| 58% (1409/1012) | Sets Win/Loss | 54% (489/414) |
| 53% (11855/10374) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (4319/3996) |
| 0.08 | Aces Per Game | 0.22 |
| 832 | Aces Total | 893 |
| 0.09 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.22 |
| 1021 | Total Double Faults | 871 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 610.84 | Average Opponent Rank | 554.34 |
| 59% (19179/32680) | 1st Serve % | 52% (7503/14479) |
| 65% (12450/19179) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (5293/7503) |
| 50% (6688/13503) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (3385/6977) |
| 46% (1659/3629) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 46% (693/1522) |
| 43% (13710/32035) | Return Points Win % | 41% (5801/14033) |
| 61% (630/1039) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 54% (216/397) |
| 56% (5/9) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 49% (118/241) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 43% (40/92) |
| 57% (176/307) | Deciding Set Win % | 47% (51/108) |
| 89% (614/546) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (213/186) |
| 11% (614/68) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (213/27) |
| 22% (441/95) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 16% (185/30) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
